ࡱ>  B(bjbjT~T~ 4466B " " eeeeeyyyyyd" ikkkkkk*!#ZkekeeVVVXeeiViVVP1Hy(.U0,&$V&$&$etVkkV&$" +: Institutionalizing Access to Records in the Federal Government Sarah Cohen Knight Professor of the Practice DeWitt Wallace Center for Media and Democracy Duke University Public Comments for the Media Access to Government Information Conference April 12, 2011 Accessing government records can occur both through the Freedom of Information Act and other, less formal, methods. The flaws in FOIA have been  HYPERLINK "http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=5033" well documented it is expensive, time-consuming and ultimately unsatisfying for many journalists and the public. For this conference, Id like to focus not on complaints about FOIA or open records practice, but on ways that access to government records at the federal level can be institutionalized. Ideally, these practices would end the need for many of the existing FOIA requests, and make the law more efficient when it is used. Id like to start with a few principles that are widely acknowledged in theory, if not in practice. First, the public owns its records, not the agencies that act as custodians. Second, access to those records is based on the democratic need to hold government officials and agents accountable for actions taken in the publics name and with the publics money. Finally, the artifacts of governing spending, inspecting, prosecuting, and regulating are the records that matter most for this purpose. With those seeds planted, then, we can move beyond whether the public has a right to see records and toward ways of making that process simpler, cheaper, and less sensitive to shifting political and budgetary winds. Others here have talked about a basic set of documents that should be available by default in a simple form and in a known location grant and contract documents, spending records, personnel lists, desk calendars of senior officials, agency visitor logs, congressional correspondence, enforcement actions and other standard byproducts of agency business. Making these common records routinely accessible would go a long way toward both institutionalizing access and reducing the need for FOIA. I want to mention a few other policy changes that could be encouraged or implemented across executive branch agencies through agencies like the Office of Management and Budget, the ˹ֳ, the Office of Personnel Management and the General Services Administration. Access to real records Generally, the public is not privvy (without FOIA requests) to the releasable portions of the actual records created within agencies in the process of doing their jobs. For example, usaspending.gov does not tap into the systems used in agencies to obligate funds and the Office of Personnel Managements database of employees is not the system used to generate paychecks or hire or promote employees. This problem of creating side systems for a public set of books that differ from the actual records pervades most large records systems in the federal government. For instance, agencies usually create a public schedule for officials that contain only the items they want publicized. It is frequent to see no public events for weeks on end in these documents. Access to the real desk calendars remains rare. Similarly, email systems are not always searched for responses to FOIA requests. Instead, those records deemed important are printed and filed separately. Data.gov adds another layer of potential confusion -- agencies must take yet another step to create records for its catalog. The arguably fictitious set of records are created and maintained at great cost and effort but they cannot track the actual administration of programs or activities of agencies. They are by nature incomplete, out of date and inaccurate: in a fiscally responsible government, how much effort should we expect employees make to create duplicative records that have no relationship to their ability to carry out their missions or are not already created as part of that mission? The answer is not to put more money and time into systems that are not artifacts of doing a job, but to find ways to tap into existing financial management, procurement, email, calendaring, payroll and similar systems to extract the publicly releasable portions. Periodic and required openness reviews: Anticipating the publics right to information and designing records collections with that value in mind would take time. But Im convinced it would reduce the cost of administering an openness plan while giving the public more complete access to releasable portions of records. Taking these planning steps would give FOIA officers and other officials better access to their own records, reducing the need for expensive and laborious searches within units. Agencies already certify new or substantially revamped computer systems for security and privacy, but not for public disclosure. Contracting and systems development procedures ought to require that a) unreleasable confidential information is segregated from publicly releasable portions, or is commingled only because it is truly impossible avoid, such as narratives from battlefield reports; and b) the public portions can be extracted and searched without help from an outside contractor. Similarly, the Office of Management and Budget regularly reviews every federal information collection as a function of its Paperwork Reduction Act responsibilities. Part of that review could involve a checklist for openness: where the records system is documented; how the confidential information is segregated from pieces of the records are part of the public record, and procedures for requesting records from the system. Review, and possibly reverse, policies that inhibit the release of records A patchwork of executive orders, regulations and b(3) exemptions used broadly rather than for their specific purpose has created a hall of mirrors when the public requests records that identify companies, non-profits or other organizations. Currently, the agency sends documents back to the subject of the request and asks it to cross out any information that would constitute a trade secret. Otherwise, the agency may, in some cases, risk a reverse FOIA lawsuit. This gives the subject of a request control over both the timing of the response and its completeness, as agencies rarely question the redactions. The President might consider reversing or modifying Executive Order 12600, which initially created this topsy-turvy world in the 1980s and remains in force today. Those who do business with the government as contractors, grantees or as the subjects of regulation or inspection should have to pre-segregate information from their documents that they claim would fall under Exemption 4, the trade secret and competitive harm provision. Agencies should redesign application forms and contract and grant documents so that some sections could never be considered a trade secret the scope of the work, the amount the government has agreed to pay, and the frequency of audits or other reviews. Audit reports should be similarly structured to allow for proactive disclosure. Agencies should also review regulations that unnecessarily shield basic public information from view or that are more sensitive than necessary to possible claims competitive harm and reverse FOIA actions. Make records easier to find and search There has been considerable discussion lately about creating a central repository for all FOIA requests and the responses, perhaps even the responsive records. I would settle for one centralized reading room for each cabinet-level agency containing the proactively disclosed records and FOIA requests. Right now, it is impossible to know what has been released and what has not unless the public knows the intricate structure and duties of each sub-agency. The open government portal helps for data that has been released under that initiative, but it is not usually connected to other records. These are just a few ways that the federal government could begin addressing some of the technical and practical barriers to more accountability. Moreover, instituting these policies and practices would make it more difficult to reverse in the future.   & 1 X \ , A P T i { 0 4 5 < N V hpu RTiXYlpqz~>ÿÿÿÿ߿âj< h(fJ56 hs5s5 hj<5hH2h hs5sh?hIh(fJhMz0Jjh(fJUh(fJjh(fJUhVHkhMzhq\}h?h?5@?Kl  S T hiYZopgdH2gd?joCD)6lyNj /T[ 7?Glmp}147_`ĿٷٷٷٷhVHkhR9 hF|5 hF|hF| h&5 h(fJ5hIhf h hH2h h(fJhF|h\]LhH2hs5shMzH?@}~ ##$$$D'E'F'B(gd(fJ (:>@7>KM|~ G ^ j !8!E!O!U!V!m!!!! ")"w"""#.#4## $$J$$$$$$$%$%D'E'F''+(A(B(h9_J hVHk5 hF5hIhFhR9h&h&5h&h\]LhVHkhfG21h:p/ =!"#$% DyK yK rhttp://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=5033j 666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666866666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p(8HX`~ OJPJQJ_HmH nH sH tH L`L ?Normal$CJOJPJQJ_HaJmH sH tH d d ? Heading 1$$@&'5B*CJ PJ\aJ mHph4ZsHtHZ Z ? Heading 2$$@&5CJPJ\aJmHsHtH^ ^ ? Heading 3$$@&"5>*B* PJ\mHphI}sHtHX bX ? Heading 4$$@&56PJ\]mHsHtHV V ? Heading 5$$@&B*PJmHph$@asHtHDA D ?Default Paragraph FontRiR 0 Table Normal4 l4a (k ( ?0No List 6U`6 ?0 Hyperlink >*B*phFB F ?0 Body TextxOJQJmHsHtH@/@ ?0Body Text Char CJPJaJX/!X ?Heading 1 Char#5B*CJ OJPJQJ\aJ ph4ZN/1N ?Heading 2 Char5CJOJPJQJ\aJZ/AZ ?Heading 3 Char&5>*B* CJOJPJQJ\aJphI}T/QT ?Heading 4 Char 56CJOJPJQJ\]aJbbb ? Colorful List - Accent 1 & Fm$CJPJR/qR ?Heading 5 CharB*CJOJPJQJaJph$@ae  ?0HTML Preformatted7 2( Px 4 #\'*.25@9OJQJaJmHsHtHX/X ?0HTML Preformatted CharCJOJPJQJ^Jh> h ?Title,&dPOm$)@B* CJKHPJaJ4mHph:csHtHR/R ? Title Char%@B* CJKHOJPJQJaJ4ph:cFV F ?0FollowedHyperlink >*B*phPK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] B 4jB(B(B X8@0(  B S  ? _Hlt163724828D @D FH  FD 2;EID 3337_hҀ ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o p^p`OJQJo( @ ^@ `OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o P^P`OJQJo(7_hjL         @s%H2R9j<?X@9_J(fJ\]LVHks5sMzzzq\}uF f&UIF|B D @B P@Unknown G* Times New Roman5Symbol3. * Arial7K@CambriaG5  hMS Mincho-3 fg7.{ @Calibri71 Courier?= * Courier New;WingdingsA BCambria Math 1hY;Y;r:r:202 2 2QHP $P'q\}2! xx Sarah Cohen JBlakely-Hill Oh+'0`  < H T`hpx Sarah Cohen Normal.dotmJBlakely-Hill2Microsoft Office Word@G@~H@~HrGضVT$mV [[&" WMFC N `ԀlVT$m EMFԀT$I*U"   Rp@"Calibri!$d"Q`2$!L#$Q`2$! v.1!$ ,'w.1=CX%7.{ @CalibrALink "p(1"9'1L"L"z%1t",dv% % %   TV> /@@>LInstitutionalizing Access to Records in the Federal Government1%  1 11-$1,8&'.$% 04.'1!0%1 1.*.1.!-;0,.!1K.1TT? Vu /@@? LP 7 T6/@@ LdSarah Cohen+-!-1111.2TT6/@@LP 7 T 6/@@ LKnight Professor of the Practice21,1 0!1.%%1!1 1.1!,' '-TT6/@@LP 7 T\D /@@-LDeWitt Wallace Center for Media and Democracy:.S S--'.1.1 .!1 P.1--11:.K1'!,'+TTE { /@@E LP 7 TK/@@nLlDuke University:1,.<1,. % +TTL/@@LnLP 7 TT$/@@LP 7 Te/@@MILPublic Comments for the Media Access to Government Information Conference111&11JK.1 %1  1.P.1-8&'.%$ 1;1,.!1J.1 11!K-11111.!.1&.TTe/@@MLP 7 Tep/@@ LdApril 12, 281!./.T`qe/@@qLT011/..TTe2/@@LP 7Rp@"Calibri!$d"Q`2$!L#$Q`2$! v.1!$ <'w.1=CX%7.{ @Calibr8"`2"9'1L"L"z%1t"<dv% % %  TT#E/@@-LP 6 TE /@@!LAccessing government records can 5''.$$0+*1). 0I.0 -'0 0$',0TE /@@ Ldoccur both 0''0 000T8 E/@@ 'Lthrough the Freedom of Information Act 010+00.* -.00J101 I,005'TdEK/@@LTand ,00Rp @"Calibri$d"Q`2$!L#$Q`2$! v.1!$ <'w.1=CX7.{ @Calibr"`2"9'1L"L"z%1t"<dvdv% Rp@"Calibri<'w.1=CX| A|h]||,  @wV!X0X.XX  / P ." |Т!!Iwwdv% ( Rp @"Calibri| A|h]||,  @w 0| A|h|,  @x  |`|]|j|}|] 9 @w/ P T 1||}|:wV!XIwwdv% ( % (  TN %/@@ 9Lother, less formal, methods. The flaws in FOIA have been W10. .$#1J,I.01/$-0.+B$0*=50+*-0..0Rp@ Calibri#@'$Q`2@'8$%$'Q`2@'8$ v.18$@' L'w.1=CX%7.{ @Calibrl$9'1$$z%1$Ldv% % % % % %  TO  %/@@O Llwell documentedA.00'0I.0.0'% LdO  O !??% (  TT  %/@@ LP TT %/@@ LP .TT.%/@@ LP ET/8%/@@/ Llit is expensive$.(0.0$*.TX9b%/@@9 LP,  Td%/@@}LTtimeJ.TT%/@@}LP-T%/@@}Lconsuming and ultimately '10$/J0+,000J+.*T%J /@@&" WMFC @Ԁ} Ldunsatisfying00$+$*0+TTK %_ /@@K }LP T` %F /@@` }Ltfor many journalists1 J,0)10 0,$$TTG %[ /@@G }LP T\ %n/@@\ }Lhand the public,000.000'TXo%/@@o}LP. TT%/@@}LP 6 TT#/@@LP 6 Tu/@@]LxFor this conference, *1 0$'10- .0'-T0u/@@]LpI d like to focus 0)-11'0#T1u/@@1];Lnot on complaints about FOIA or open records practice, but 0110'0J0,0#,010*=4110./ .&1 /$0 ,''-00 Tu /@@;Lon ways that access to government records at the federal le10B+*$0,,&'.$#0+0). 0J./ .&1 0$,/../. ,-T u /@@ Llvel can be inst*.',00.0$T u/@@  Lhitutionalized01/,$.0Tu/@@ Ld. Ideally, 0.,* TtT /@@< \Lthese practices would end the need for many of the existing FOIA requests, and make the law 0.$.0 +''-$A100.000.0../1J,/*10--($0+*=5 .00-$$,00J,).0-,B T T i /@@ Lmore efficient when it is used. J1..'.0B0.0$0#.0TTjT  /@@j LP 6 TT #4 /@@ LP 6 T4  /@@ LI d like to start with a few 0*.1#, B0+.AT4  /@@ HLprinciples that are widely acknowledged in theory, if not in practice. / 0'0.$0,, .B0.),&*01B.0+.000-1*/000 ,'&. Tl  /@@ LXFirst* $Tl I  /@@ 0L, the public owns its records, not the agencies 0-000'0B0$# -'1 0$/10.,+./'.$TdJ  /@@J LTthat0+TT  /@@ LP Tx  /@@ L\act as ,',$T  /@@ Lpcustodians. Second'0$10,0$*-'100T|  /@@ L\, access,''.#$TT  /@@ LP T` > /@@ LTto 1 TP  /@@l VLthose records is based on the democratic need to hold government officials and agents 01$- .&1 0$#0,$.0100.0.I1','0-.01/10+1). 0I.01',$,00,+.0$ T,  /@@ PLaccountable for actions taken in the public s name and with the public s money. ,''100,0-1,'10$,).000.000'#0,I.,/0B00-000'$J1/.*T J /@@ LhFinally, the H*0,*0. T d /@@L L|artifacts of governing t, ,'$1*1). 00+TT Kd /@@L LP l.TTK _d /@@KL LP CTx` d /@@`L 2Lspending, inspecting, prosecuting, and regulating $/-000+0$0.'0+0 1#.'00+,00 .+0,0+TT d /@@ L LP C.TT d /@@ L LP T d /@@ L Lxare the records that 6,&" WMFC Ԁ./. .&1 0$0, Td N /@@ Lmatter most for this purpose. J,. I1$1 0$00 00$.TTOd  /@@O LP 6 TT #D /@@, LP 6 TdC ; /@@ YLWith those seeds planted, then, we can move beyond whether the public has a right to see R0/1$.$..0#0,0.00.0B-',0J0*-0.)100B0.0.0.000'0,#, +01$.- T #/@@ L|records and toward ways .'1 0#,001B, 0B,)$T #/@@ HLof making that process simpler, cheaper, and less sensitive to shifting 0J,*0+0,01'.#$$J0. '0.,/. ,00-$$#.0$*.1$00+ T#b/@@{Lpolitical and budgetary winds. 01',,00000+.,*B00$TTc#/@@c{LP 6 TT#/@@LP 6 Txs/@@[L\Others =0. $Tls/@@[LXhere 0- .TDs/@@[TLhave talked about a basic set of documents that should be available by default in a 0+*.,*./,010,0,$'$-1/1'0I./$0,$01000-,*,,0.0*0.,00+ T$sO/@@$Lsimple form and in a known location $J0.1J,000+*00A01',10TTPs~/@@PLP -TT}s/@@}LP Ts% /@@Lpgrant and contrac+ ,0,00&10 ,'T& s /@@&  Ldt documents00'0I.0$T s/@@ Lt, spending records, $/.000+ .'1 0$ T S/@@;3Lpersonnel lists, desk calendars of senior officials0. $100.#$0-$*&,.0/, $1$.00 1',$TX  S/@@ ;LP, T  S/@@ ;Lxagency visitor logs, ,*.0'**$1 1+$T S/@@ ;Lhcongressional &10+ .$$1/, TSu/@@Llcorrespondence, '1 -$0100.0&.TvS /@@vFLenforcement actions and other standard byproducts of agency business. .01 '-I.0,'10$,0010- $,/0, 00*0 100'#1,+.0')00$0.$$ Ttv 3/@@1LMaking these common records routinely accessible O,*0+0-$.'0IJ10 .&1 0$100.),'&.$$0.TXw  3/@@w LPwoA1T i3/@@ Luld go a long way toward both 00+1+10+B,)1B, 0010 T3, /@@:Linstitutionalizing access and reducing the need for FOIA. 0$010,$0+,'&.$$,/0 .00'0+0.0-.01 *=5TT- 3b /@@- LP 6 TT#/@@LP 6 T /@@j;LI want to mention a few other policy changes that could be B,01I.010+-B10. 01&*'0,0+.#0,'1/00.T /@@ j!Lencouraged or implemented across .0&10 ,+.01 J0-J.0.0,'1$$ T/@@JLexecutive branch agencies through agencies like the Office of Management a.(.'0*-0 ,0'0,+.0'.$0 10+0,+.0'-$*-0.&" WMFC Ԁ<'.1N,0,+.I.0,TX/@@Llnd Budget, the 00100+.0. T(b/@@JOLNational Archives, the Office of Personnel Management and the General Services ;,10,5 '0*.$0.=&.1/. $10/.O,0,*.I-0,000.9.0. ,). *&.# Tb/@@LhAdministration50J0$ ,10TXbD/@@LP. TTEbz/@@ELP 6 TT#B/@@*LP 6Rp@"Calibri!$d"Q`2$!L#$Q`2$! v.1!$ \'w.1=CX%7.{ @CalibrV1Pz PP|"9'1L"L"z%1t"\dv% % %  % % % TTB%/@@LPA8T&Bd/@@& L`ccess to &'.%$ 1% % % TdeB/@@eLTreal -0% % % TTB /@@LP TxB)/@@L\records!-'1!1$TT*B`/@@*LP 7 % % % T"/@@ LxGenerally, the public :.0. ,*0-000'T"/@@ Lhis not privvy $000 *)*TT"/@@ LP(T< "/@@ Lxwithout FOIA requestsB010*=5 .00-$$TT= X "/@@= LP)TTY m "/@@Y LP Tn 4"/@@n "Lto the releasable portions of the 10...,$,0-01 10$10- T"/@@zLactual records created with,'0, .&1 0$' .,.0B0T"/@@z=Lin agencies in the process of doing their jobs. For example, 0,+.0'.$00.01'.#$0010+0.10$)1 .(+I0. TT/@@LPu0T/@@L|saspending.gov does not $,$0.000++1*00.$/1T/@@ L`tap into ,001T /@@ L`the system0.#*$-JTT  /@@ LPs#TT  /@@ LP Td  /@@ LTused0$.0TT  /@@ LP T  /@@ #Lin agencies to obligate funds and t/,+.0'.$010+,.000$,00T/@@ L`he Office 0.=&. Tt q/@@Y>Lof Personnel Management s database of employees is not the sys10. #100.O,0,+-J.0$0,,0,$.1-J00*..#$01/.$)$Tu q/@@u YLxtem used to generate -J0#.01+./. ,. TqK/@@Llpaychecks or hir0,*'0.')$1 0 TLq/@@LL|e or promote employees..1 00J0.-J01*-.$TTq/ /@@LP 6 TT#Q/@@9LP 6% % 666666666666666666666666666666666666 6 66 6  6 66 6  6 66 6  6 66 6  6 66 6 6666666666&WMFCԀ6666666666  .t.@"Calibri--- h2 U\>s/Institutionalizing Access to Records in the Federal Government  2 Us/ 2 b\ s/Sarah Cohen 2 bs/ ;2 p\ s/Knight Professor of the Practice 2 ps/ O2 ~\-s/DeWitt Wallace Center for Media and Democracy     2 ~Cs/ "2 \s/Duke University 2 s/  2 \s/ y2 \Is/Public Comments for the Media Access to Government Information Conference     2 s/ 2 \ s/April 12, 22 s/011 2 s/ @"Calibri--- 2 \s/ =2 \!s/Accessing government records can  2 s/occur both F2 1's/through the Freedom of Information Act   2 s/and  @"Calibri-@"Calibri- @"Calibri--a2 \9s/other, less formal, methods. The flaws in FOIA have been n  @ Calibri------ "2 ds/well documented - @ !Pd-  2 s/  2 s/ 2 s/ "2 s/it is expensive2 s/, 2 \s/time  2 qs/-12 us/consuming and ultimately   2 s/unsatisfying 2 $s/ )2 's/for many journalists  2 s/  2 s/and the public2 s/.  2 s/  2 \s/ +2 \s/For this conference, &2 s/Id like to focus d2 ;s/not on complaints about FOIA or open records practice, but e d2 \;s/on ways that access to government records at the federal lee "2 ns/vel can be inst2  s/itutionalizeds2  s/. Ideally, e2 $\\s/these practices would end the need for many of the existing FOIA requests, and make the law   ;2 2\ s/more efficient when it is used.  2 2s/  2 ?\s/ 72 M\s/Id like to start with a few dw2 MHs/principles that are widely acknowledged in theory, if not in practice. 2 [\s/FirstdS2 [p0s/, the public owns its records, not the agencies  2 [Ds/that 2 [Ws/ 2 [Ys/act as s&2 [vs/custodians. Second2 [s/, access 2 [s/ 2 [s/to 2 i\Vs/those records is based on the democratic need to hold government officials and agents   2 w\Ps/accountable for actions taken in the publics name and with the publics money.   2 w s/Finally, the .2 \s/artifacts of governing  2 s/ 2 s/ V2 2s/spending, inspecting, prosecuting, and regulating  2 s/ 2 s/ +2 s/are the records that g82 \s/matter most for this purpose.   2 s/  2 \s/ 2 \Ys/With those seeds planted, then, we can move beyond whether the public has a right to see a  /2 \s/records and toward ways w2 Hs/of making that process simpler, cheaper, and less sensitive to shifting   :2 \s/political and budgetary winds.  2 s/  2 \s/ 2 \s/Others s2 ~s/here s2 Ts/have talked about a basic set of documents that should be available by default in a  A2 \$s/simple form and in a known location    2 s/ 2  s/ %2 s/grant and contracd2 _ s/t documents )2 s/, spending records, X2 \3s/personnel lists, desk calendars of senior officials,2 8s/, +2 =s/agency visitor logs,  2 s/congressional #2 \s/correspondence, t2 Fs/enforcement actions and other standard byproducts of agency business.  U2 \1s/Making these common records routinely accessible l  2 Is/wo82 Ws/uld go a long way toward both b2 *\:s/institutionalizing access and reducing the need for FOIA.  2 *`s/  2 8\s/ d2 F\;s/I want to mention a few other policy changes that could be  =2 Fm!s/encouraged or implemented across o  z2 T\Js/executive branch agencies through agencies like the Office of Management a  "2 Ts/nd Budget, the 2 b\Os/˹ֳ, the Office of Personnel Management and the General Services    2 o\s/Administration 2 os/.  2 os/  2 }\s/ @"Calibri------ 2 \s/A2 c s/ccess to ---2 s/real--- 2 s/ 2 s/recordss 2 s/ ---,2 \s/Generally, the public  2 s/is not privvy  2 s/(+2 s/without FOIA requests  2 bs/) 2 es/ >2 h"s/to the releasable portions of the 42 \s/actual records created withtg2 =s/in agencies in the process of doing their jobs. For example,  2 \s/u/2 bs/saspending.gov does not 2  s/tap into 2  s/the system 2 .s/s 2 3s/ 2 5s/used 2 Ks/ @2 N#s/in agencies to obligate funds and t2  s/he Office h2 \>s/of Personnel Managements database of employees is not the sys   +2 s/tem used to generate o #2 \s/paychecks or hir.2 s/e or promote employees.    2 s/  2 \s/ "System--//ss//ss..ss..rr..rr..rr..rr..rr..rr..rr--rr--qq--qq--qq--qq--qq--qq--qq,,qq՜.+,D՜.+,Tx  :2   Title (V^j_PID_LINKBASE _PID_HLINKSAA 9http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=50332  !"$%&'()*+,-./012345789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry F DHData 1Table#6$WordDocument44SummaryInformation(6DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjy  F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q